Details

This observational, cross-sectional study was conducted to examine the relationship between perceived and actual safe ambulation levels in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) and their association with key clinical outcomes. Adult participants (≥18 years) with traumatic or non-traumatic iSCI at T3 or lower levels (ASIA C or D) admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation program were included. Exclusion criteria were inability to provide informed consent or severe cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination score \< 25). The primary outcome was walking status, assessed using the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI II). Both patient-rated (P13) and therapist-rated (T5) WISCI II levels were recorded to capture perceived safe ambulation limits. Secondary outcomes included lower extremity muscle strength (LEMS), 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), Timed Up and Go (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III), and WHOQOL-BREF-TR for health-related quality of life. Additional questionnaires assessed fall risk perception, assistive device preferences, readiness for discharge, coping strategies, acceptance and action levels, and assistive technology satisfaction. Gait parameters were measured on a C-Mill® treadmill platform, including step time, stance phase percentage, stride length, step width, cadence, gait speed, and double support time. Falls and near-fall incidents in the past year were self-reported. Data were analyzed to determine correlations between perception-based and performance-based measures and to explore the relationship between discrepancies in patient and therapist ratings with fall frequency and functional independence. The study aims to provide evidence to guide clinical decision-making in rehabilitation, optimize discharge planning, reduce fall risk, and improve the integration of patient perspectives into therapy planning for individuals with iSCI.